Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas Flora, MD, LSSBB's avatar

Tom, I think that's fair and a good call out. I think that Eliza’s indigo work was colonial-era (1739–1744), a century before the antebellum period—but on your larger point 100 percent noted and agree. The actual work — growing, harvesting, fermenting, beating the vats, drying the cakes — was done entirely by enslaved laborers.

The darker irony: her “success” made things worse. Once Britain put a bounty on indigo in 1749, it became South Carolina’s second great export after rice, and the profits directly fueled a massive expansion of the slave trade into Charleston

I promise to choose my historical precedents more carefully, moving forward. Thanks for reading and for a thoughtful reply—this is why I love the smart people her on this new platform!

Tom Stamm's avatar

While the message is inspiring, viewing it through the lens of indigo cultivation in antebellum South Carolina rings a little hollow considering that the actual work was performed by enslaved people. https://www.ccpl.org/charleston-time-machine/indigo-fabric-early-south-carolina

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?